Showing posts with label taxes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label taxes. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 August 2011

Just What is Going On In The World?

We have riots in the streets of London, Al Shabaab fighting to keep western aid from reaching millions of starving people in Africa, stock markets around the world on a roller coaster ride from hell, mass killing going on in Syria and an American president who has failed his people on the economy, just to name a few.

It is a world in turmoil, the likes we probably have not seen since the second world war and it doesn't look like it will get better any time soon.  Which begs the question, what can we do to fix things?  My common sense solutions below.

Our world for the most part has been living life like socialists for far too long. Even the right side of the political spectrum has been giving free hand outs far too often.  We need to get back to our roots, where people were not afraid to put in an honest days work, raise a family, and expect nothing from government unless it is an unforeseen circumstance such as drought, hurricanes, earthquakes and the like.  Far too often we look to government to step in when times are tough, instead of rolling up our sleeves and getting to work like our forefathers did.  If we truly want change we have to look inside ourselves and decide that change has to start from within.  We are the ones who need to change, we need to stop with the handouts, dig deep and get things done!

Solution for anarchy in London and everywhere else.  Make the people pay for their actions!  Too long have we allowed this kind of stuff to go on without serious consequences.  Sure, have your peaceful demonstrations but if you get out of line you are going to jail, it is that simple.  How many of these people would be out doing what they do if they knew that they would get much, much more than a slap on the wrist?  If the justice system actually enforced the law these people would be looking at years in jail.  It is time to make the justice system work the way it is supposed too and stop pandering to the far left.  This will bring people back down to earth and make them accountable for their actions.  The use of rubber bullets, tear gas, and other methods should be allowed as soon as the police see actions like this ongoing.  These anarchists will soon fall in line, or at least learn how to have a peaceful demonstration.

Starvation in Africa.  This can be called a man made disaster, yes the drought is out of our hands but the price of food has also played a very large roll in this.  The price of food is being driven by the countries such as China and India as well as others.  But also adding to this is the use of food products being used to produce fuels.  This action, especially in the U.S. and Canada has made grains much more expensive which in turn boosts costs of feeding livestock and other meats.  What needs to be done, especially in the States is a move to a more efficient product such as switchgrass.  This stuff can be grown anywhere and does not consume as much energy to produce biofuels.  The energy needs of the U.S. can also be alleviated by drilling for fuels at home.  There has been too much of this "not in my backyard" B.S. and for generations the U.S. has not allowed energy companies to drill some very large economical areas that would dramatically decrease the country's dependence on Middle Eastern oil.  This would mean jobs, taxes and much much more for the U.S. economy, something they dearly need.  But first the left need to get the hell out of the way and let the people who actually want to help the country do their job!  There is enough natural gas in the U.S. to last generations, which will buy them enough time to develop other means of energy that are currently under development.  It is a band aid on the problem but one that could tie them over until these new energy strategies come to fruition.

The U.S. economy and it's affect on the world as a whole.  The powers that be in Washington need to start working for the people and not for their own political agendas.  There needs to be serious cuts to spending, not this piece of junk that they tabled last week which does nothing to cut their debt.  It in fact allows the debt to grow to 20 trillion dollars by the year 2020.  20 Trillion Bucks!!!  You think things are bad now, just think what their debt rating will be like by 2020!  Everything needs to be cut, the people just need to wake up and realize that they will have to do with less.  Less government handouts, less entitlement spending, less government employment opportunities and yes, less unions and their constant drag on a nations ability to compete on the international stage.  But this goes back to the change we need to find within ourselves, it starts at home and then you can hold your politicians accountable.  The Nancy Pelosi's of the world need to be run out of politics and vote in someone who will make the tough decisions, not the easy ones that will garner a lot of votes.  It is this way of thinking that has gotten us into this mess and it needs to change or the mess will just keep piling up.  The people in the U.S. need to also get over the "I don't pay tax" way of thinking.  In order to get this debt paid down a national tax on consumption is a must.  Everyone pays it on goods and services, not just the rich, and middle class.  The nice thing about a consumption tax is that it is a fair system that will tax the rich way more because they obviously would consume much more than the lower classes.  The national consumption tax would bring in un-foretold amounts of income to the federal government and help them get their great country back on track.  Tea Party, GOP, DEMS, it doesn't matter who you are, get your act together and do what is right for the country!

The Middle East uprising has been a missed opportunity for the west to show that we are behind our fellow brothers and sisters.  Our politicians are too slow to react and typically the reaction is not strong enough to prove solidarity.  We need actions, not just words.  Add in the U.N. which is being run like a kangaroo court and needs to make wholesale changes in order for it to be legit once again.  The security council laws need to change to make it majority rule instead of giving the permanent members the ability to quash anything that they disagree with.  It is either that or do away with the security council and let the vote happen between all member nations of the U.N. where 50% plus one means action.  This ability by Russia and China to hand tie the security council from recommending action is ridiculous and has made the U.N. the laughing stock of the world.  It no longer is legitimate and unless changes happen it will remain this way.  For far too long the U.S. and it's allies have had to police the world at it's expense.  If any action is needed in the world it should be international law that all expenses are shared by those who are part of the U.N. and then all money recouped by the country that has needed the help.  Then the trillions of dollars the U.S. spends in taking action would come back the the U.S. people, sounds fair doesn't it?  It has cost the U.S. a trillion dollars or more going into Iraq and Iran to liberate them, should this money not be paid back over time?

These are just some common sense solutions to a few of the world's problems, there are many more problems of course but these are the major ones right now and if these changes are made the world's economy would have a chance at stabilizing and the markets would return to normal.  Again, it is time to hold our politicians accountable and right the ship before it gets consumed by the wave of socialism.

Friday, 5 August 2011

Is Socialism Dying a Slow Death? let's Keep Our Fingers Crossed!

I think it is starting to sink in, that socialism does not work and has led to what we are seeing the world over.  Economies in distress because of a few countries who have for generations lived off the government.  This needs to be corrected by all, especially in the U.S. where things are looking really bad.  Here in Canada, we must find a way for Quebec and the Maritimes to stand on their own.  Live within their means, balance budgets and stop looking for handouts from Ottawa and the rest of the country.  It should be law that every government in our dominion has to put forward a balanced budget, no matter what the economy is doing.  Just like families, when things are tough you tighten the purse strings, we should expect no less from our governments!



Italy speeds up austerity to calm financial nerves
ROME — Italy will speed up a package of austerity measures approved last month to achieve budget balance by 2013, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi said Friday in a fightback against a wave of financial market panic.
"We believe it is opportune to accelerate the measures... to reach a budget balance early -- in 2013 instead of 2014," Berlusconi said at a news conference.
"We are responding to the demands of markets that are governed by no-one, not even speculators, and operate independently from economic reality," he said.
"We have to recognise that the world has entered a global financial crisis that concerns all countries," he added.
Italy's main centre-left opposition Democratic Party warned that the speeding up of austerity cuts was "irresponsible." Berlusconi's critics say the measures hit Italy's poorest hardest by reducing social welfare payments.
Berlusconi said lawmakers would be called back early from summer recess to start working "immediately" on measures including a constitutional amendment that would force Italian governments to keep balanced budgets.
The amendment -- similar to one in force in Germany -- was announced by Berlusconi after emergency talks with trade unions and big business on Thursday.
"International speculators are paying particular attention to us and we have to put a stop to it," he said on Friday.
Economy Minister Giulio Tremonti meanwhile said the government would also present some major labour market reforms to trade unions and big business.
"The labour market is fundamental for development and investments," he said, adding that there would be a crackdown on a variety of tax exemptions.
Italy has been badly hit on the stock and bond markets in recent weeks by investors concerned about its high public debt, anaemic economic growth, as well as signs of tensions within Berlusconi's centre-right coalition.
Italian shares plunged 13.12 percent this past week, although market rumours that the European Central Bank was intervening to support the highly vulnerable markets for Italian and Spanish bonds helped stem the slide on Friday.
Italy's parliament last month adopted a four-year 48-billion-euro ($68-billion) austerity budget aimed at cutting the public deficit from 4.6 percent of output last year to just 0.2 percent by 2014.
The plan, which included deep cuts to regional subsidies, family tax benefits and top-tier pensions, was heavily criticised by many commentators for delaying by far the most painful cuts until 2013 and 2014.
The mandate of Berlusconi's centre-right government runs out in 2013.
The 74-year-old prime minister's motorcade was met by around 100 protesters outside government offices in central Rome as he arrived for the news conference.
"Clown!" one man shouted. Another said: "You are the ruin of Italy, go home!"
Berlusconi also told reporters he had agreed with French President Nicolas Sarkozy on holding an emergency meeting of G7 finance ministers of leading world economies in a few days to discuss the debt crisis ahead of a possible G8 summit.
France holds the presidency of the G7, G8 and G20 economic powers.
A spokesman for Berlusconi, Paolo Bonaiuti, later said that the prime minister's comments were part of an "ongoing reflection" and did not mean that "a decision has been taken" on the international meeting.

Wednesday, 20 July 2011

My Fix For Big Labour!

O.K., I may have said this before but for anyone new to reading this blog I just want to explain my theory on how to fix the problem with big labour.

First thing is we need to figure out that there is a problem to begin with, if our politicians can't figure this out then they need to be ousted.  Once we have decided we need to do something about the contracts signed with big labour then we need to make the changes to fix the problem.

$200 billion dollars, that is how much the federal government has in Unfunded Pension Liabilities going forward. That means there is no money set aside to pay for the pensions that are on the horizon.  This needs to be addressed now and not later.

First thing that needs to be looked at is something called "right to work legislation"  This simply implies that if you have a job in any sector be it private or public that you have the right to join the union or not.  This is being done in a lot of States right now and is proving out to be very successful, in fact it has made it possible for many states to show budget surpluses this year all the while the federal government is drowning in debt and on the verge of defaulting.

When you get a job, is it not a basic human right to decide whether you want to be represented by a labour group or not?  I mean this is a democratic country is it not?  If I were to go and get a job tomorrow as a welder at a local steel plant, why should I be forced to join a union?  Can I not keep my union dues and just go and do my job, that is all I want.  I do not feel my money should go to pay for a bunch of bureaucrats in the union so that they can get paid 24/7/365, even though the contract only expires every 3-4 years.  I want to be able to spend my $1000/year how I see fit, be it on my family, a vacation, whatever but I will have the right to do what I want with my own money.  I should not be forced to pay for something I do not believe in, that in my mind, is not democratic.

Now some will say without unions the labour pool will be taken advantage of by corporations, and to that I say we already have labour standard board that for on intents and purpose do the same thing that the unions do.  And if the worker feels something is wrong, the labour board is there to step in and represent the worker.

But what about negotiations?  You can't expect every person to negotiate their own contract?  No, I don't, but what I do think is very possible, is for the worker to vote for hiring a law firm to represent the group as a whole.  This is democratic and the law firm would only get paid during negotiations(other than a small yearly retainer).  The cost to the worker would be far less than what they pay in dues on a yearly basis meaning more take home pay.

The next step would to be to change pensions.  The worker needs to fund more of their own pensions, it is done this way by the private sector and is proven to be sustainable. Especially when it comes to the public sector, the taxpayers should not be on the hook for large pensions that you would not get in the private sector.  The public and private sector need to be more aligned on the pension and benefit front, what you get should not vary that much between the two.  With employees paying more into their pension it would alleviate the future liability that the country has and make sure that the pension is there for you when you do go to retire.

As you can see the worker is still represented, and more than likely represented better by a law firm than say some Joe who rose up through the ranks and does not know law at all.  This is a common sense approach to one of the problems facing our country.  I know that a final version of this would need some polish but I feel it is a great starting point and is a large step in the right direction.  If you agree, talk to your MP, MLA, council members, we need to make these changes for the whole of our country.

Is It Time To Live Within Our Means In Canada?

It is my belief that all governments should live within their means.  This means balanced budgets, cuts to programs that are either ineffective, outdated or simply not run as lean as it can.  Our governments have allowed the pigs to sit at the trough long enough and it is time to tighten the belt strings before it really affects our economies.  The cuts really need to start within government where they have been guilty of growing governments at unprecedented rates over the last 10-20 years.  This means more salaries being paid, more benefits and more pensions going unfunded.  The federal government alone has a $200,000,000,000 unfunded pension shortfall, where is this going to leave the younger generations?  They are going to have to pay for our failures?  Doesn't seem fair now does it?


This is why I am calling on all governments in Canada to make it law to have balanced budgets.  Governments should be run just like any business or family, which means living within it's means.  No more hiring, spending cuts and unfortunately maybe even some small tax increases when and where needed.  Governments should have the ability to raise and lower the GST, PST & HST on a yearly basis in order to meet their budget needs.  This will put them in the position where they know the people will not stand for much in the way of tax increases and learn how to make do with what they have coming in with taxes and other means of revenue, just like any business or family has to.


P.S. Just how long do we continue to pay these high amounts to Quebec? $7.8 billion in one year alone, should they be forced to make do with much less?  I think it is time for them to stand up and become more productive and develop their economy better.  But in order to do that they must vote the right way and I am afraid that will not happen until we(the rest of Canada) cut them off.



Growing equalization payments to Ontario threaten country: expert

Aaron Lynett/National Post
Aaron Lynett/National Post
Federal equalization payments to Ontario have risen 534% in the two years since the province received its first payment.
  Jul 20, 2011 – 6:35 AM ET Last Updated: Jul 19, 2011 8:16 PM ET
By Lee Greenberg
TORONTO — In just three years, Ontario has become the second-largest recipient of equalization payments in the country, with $2.2-billion set to flow into its “have-not” coffers this year.
Only Quebec, which takes in $7.8-billion in such payments, receives more.
More ominously, Ontario’s burgeoning take threatens to destabilize Confederation, says one of the country’s leading academics, by creating problems for Quebec, Manitoba and the Atlantic provinces.
Tom Courchene, an economist at Queen’s University and a senior scholar at the Institute of Research on Public Policy says those other have-not provinces will find themselves increasingly squeezed out of a fixed pot of equalization money as Ontario takes a bigger share of the pie.
Federal equalization payments to Ontario have risen 534% in the two years since the province received its first payment. The program has been capped at Canada’s GDP growth since 2009.
Courchene says, that as a result, a “crowding out” effect will make flaws in the oft-criticized federal program harder to ignore.
“The poorer Ontario is, the less other provinces are going to get,” he says. “It’s a big issue and it’s going to get bigger.”
Matthew Mendelsohn, director of the Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation, says Ontario’s growing equalization take will likely cause tension between recipient provinces and the federal government.
“The growth cap has certainly not been happily received by many provinces,” he says. “They’re pushing for change here. And as Ontario’s take grows, that may put even more pressure on other provinces, who may escalate their argument with the federal government, that the federal government should stop the artificial (limit on) growth of equalization.”
Ontario’s diminishing status is partially a result of the demise of its manufacturing industry, says Courchene. The decline is also a relative one, however.
Compared to the soaring economies in B.C., Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland, all resource-rich provinces whose oil and gas are fuelling growth in India and China — Ontario is looking increasingly impoverished.
“(Equalization) really isn’t a reflection of a province’s underlying economic strength,” says Mendelsohn. “It’s a reflection of whether they are dominantly a natural resource, carbon petro-economy or not . . . .That’s what’s driving the equalization program right now. It makes sense now to think of oil provinces and non-oil and gas provinces rather than poor provinces and rich provinces.”
The resource boom in those petro economies has had a double effect on Ontario, having sent the Canadian dollar soaring by roughly 40% since 2004.
The higher dollar has in turn clobbered Ontario’s struggling manufacturing sector, which has hemorrhaged 290,000 full-time jobs over the past decade.
In economic theory, that scenario is known as “Dutch disease”, so coined by the Economist in 1977 after manufacturing in the Netherlands was decimated by the discovery of a large natural gas field.
“We’re just too small an economy to try to have one of the largest resource operations in the world at the same time as trying to have a world class manufacturing sector,” says Courchene, one of the most prolific and well-respected scholars in Canada.
The Kingston-based academic suggests implementing a fixed exchange rate with the U.S.
“We need to be part of a larger currency so when oil prices rise, we stay with the U.S. dollar, we don’t go up by 20-30% and destroy manufacturing.”
Meanwhile, Ontario continues to struggle even after its equalization top up, with lower levels of public services than many other provinces.
A report by a Winnipeg-based think tank in 2010 stated Ontario had fewer public servants, nurses, doctors, teachers, day-care spots and long-term care beds than in most other provinces.
That runs counter to the objectives of equalization, introduced in 1957 as a means to ensure comparable public services in all 10 provinces.
It costs Ontario roughly 10% more, on average, to provide a “bundle” of public services — one doctor, one nurse, one social worker, a judge and a police officer, for example — than it does in other have-not provinces, says Courchene.
While federal MPs from traditional have-not provinces have long fought for greater funding for their home turf, Ontario MPs have typically considered themselves federal first.
In negotiating a range of federal allocations for such things as immigration settlement, training funds, infrastructure and social housing, Ontario has had to settle for inferior agreements in recent years.
“There’s still a perception out there that Ontario is the fat cat,” says Courchene. “It’s all part of a pattern where everybody assumes Ontario is big enough to look after itself. The answer is increasingly it isn’t. It’s not able to provide the level of public services that other provinces can.”
Although Ontario was eligible for payments for five years from 1977 to 1981, federal politicians at the time balked at sending money to the country’s most populous province. Ontario received its federal transfer, $347-million, in 2009-10.
In 2010, equalization jumped to $972-million. This year it will total $2.2-billion.
Ottawa Citizen

Monday, 6 June 2011

Finally Get Our Budget


Conservatives present 'Groundhog Day' budget


Photos

Slideshow image
Minister of Finance Jim Flaherty laughs as he answers questions in the House of Commons after delivering the federal budget on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Monday, June 6, 2011. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)
By: CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Monday Jun. 6, 2011 3:20 PM PT
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty unveiled his first majority budget Monday, with only two changes from the one he offered before the last election -- more money for Quebec and cuts for political parties.
The Conservative government forged ahead with the budget they ran on during the election which featured modest proposals -- specialty tax breaks, slightly more pension help for seniors and the promise to cut the deficit by 2014-15.
As expected, the new measures are a $2.2 billion payment to Quebec to fully harmonize its provincial sales tax with the GST and a pledge to do away with the $2-per-vote public subsidy for federal political parties.
The move will undercut the Conservatives' political rivals, leaving them almost completely reliant on private fundraising.
In a brief speech, Flaherty repeatedly mentioned public support for his budget.
"A month ago the people spoke," Flaherty told the House of Commons.
"Through their democratic power they clearly signalled the need for a principled, stable government at this challenging but promising moment in our nation's history."
While the Conservatives pledged to cut the deficit, experts say the first austerity budget won't be until 2012, when the government will have to make some hard choices on what to cut.
"There will be some programs that will not continue. There's no question about that," Flaherty told reporters Monday.
Flaherty said Canadians "should be aware" there are still risks in the global economy.
"I urge my G7 partners to deal . . . with the situation in Greece, for example, so it doesn't blow out of control and affect banks in other countries," he told CTV's Power Play. "What we've done in the budget is . . . take into account there are more risks out there."
Flaherty was confident the government could find savings in the future to cut into the deficit.
"To find five per cent on the operating side of the largest enterprise in the country is no big deal," he said. "It's not easy, but it's no big deal. It's not dramatic restraint."
NDP Leader Jack Layton said the budget had too many tax breaks for banks and didn't have enough on job creation, pensions and healthcare.
Layton said he didn't agree with the political party subsidy cuts "but we'll live with it."
The official Opposition leader said the budget doesn't spend enough on infrastructure, which would have spurred job creation.
"We would have liked to have seen an adjustment to the corporate tax reduction, a slowing down in the continued giveaway to the banks and oil companies and we would have taken that money and given a reduction to small businesses," Layton said.
Liberal interim leader Bob Rae called it a "groundhog budget . . . with the same spirit of compliancy" on poverty.
"It's not a document that's intended for all Canadians," he said.
The projected deficit for 2010-2011 is $36.2 billion, which is $4.3 billion better than what was forecasted in March.
But the deficit for the 2011-2012 fiscal year has nudged upwards to $32.3 billion.
Other measures in Monday's budget:
  • $400-million to extend the ecoENERGY Retrofit-Homes program for a year.
  • A Family Caregiver Tax Credit that would save $300 for people caring for sick or disabled relatives.
  • Legislation to make the $2-billion Gas Tax Fund permanent for municipalities.
  • An initiative to forgive student debt up to $40,000 for doctors and $20,000 for nurses who move to rural areas.

Friday, 27 May 2011

Labour Unrest In Saskatchewan

In my first real post to this blog I bring up the hot topic of labour unrest in Saskatchewan. There is a huge gap between labour and employer right now and with either side not willing to budge a whole lot. So here's my common sense take on the issue;

The problem is the public sector and government, which as a taxpayer, we are all involved whether we like it or not.  Do you lean left or right?  It does not matter because the issues will affect everyone in the province.  Ok, I think we can all agree that people who do their job well should get paid appropriately, that is not the problem here.  The problem in the past 50-60 years or so is that Saskatchewan has been a solid socialist province, the CCF/NDP has always been the governing party.  People in Saskatchewan, like anywhere else in the world, wanted more for themselves and their family.  Looking at other parts of the country and especially next door in Alberta made us envious. How can people who are separated by an invisible line live completely different lives like this?  Why was the grass always greener next door?  Well there are many reasons but the main reason is our socialist values, we kept voting in a party that was not business friendly and by having that position, business would not invest in the province which left little opportunity for our children.  We lost a couple generations of children who all moved to Alberta because, yes the grass was much, much greener over there.

So now back to the issue at hand.  Being a socialist stronghold also allowed the unions to become very powerful, not only in politics but in society in general.  We're talking well organized groups here, one's who tax their people to push their political agenda.  And what an agenda they have right now! We have a slightly right wing government that has done wonders for our province since they took over, people are coming home and staying, getting opportunity to create a successful livelihood in this great province.  But what is going on is the unions are losing their grip on power, the people have awoken and want everything that you can get in other areas of the country.  The unions are now fighting like hell to restore things, there is an election on the horizon and they are trying to make as much hay when the sun is shining.  The Teachers Union, I mean Federation is asking for a whopping 16% increase over three years, or 12% over one.  Now as a taxpayer this infuriates me to the utmost degree, here we have a profession that gets over 3 months of the year off work, while the rest of society is lucky to get 4 weeks, add in weekends and really?  Yes there are some that will do the extra curricular activities but then there is a lot who don't.  How about a bonus system for those that do?  That is common sense, people putting in extra hours get paid overtime, so why not the teachers? Also needed to be realized is that they are getting paid for working around 9 months of the year.  If they want higher pay how about working another two months like many teachers do all over the world?  Many countries are heading in this direction because there is just so much to learn and they have figured out in order to get ahead more education is needed.  The teachers need to be held accountable as well, but at the same extent so do the students and more importantly the parents who allow their kids to carry on and giving no respect to the teachers.

The 200lb gorilla in the room(and I will discuss this in length in following posts as it really affects us going forward) is pensions and benefits.  We are heading down a slippery slope here, for example the city of Regina has a shortfall in future pension and benefits of $200 million.  That's $200,000,000!!!  This is one city with a small number of unionized workers and this is the path our politicians and union have led us too.  Problem becomes, what are we going to do to fix it?  A city of 200,000 people would have to come up with another $1,000 a piece in order to take care of that tab.  And that is just where we sit today, what will that shortfall look like in 10 or 20 years?  Both sides are to blame but the majority has to fall onto the hands of the unions who put a huge amount of pressure on governments to give them what they want.  This is especially easy for the unions when the NDP have been in power most of the time.  The old saying about the squeaky wheel and grease really comes into play here.  There is no one group louder and more in your face than unions, or what I like to call them the Pro-Labour Movement.

The problem now is, how do we fix a system that is this broken?  Unions would say raise taxes on everyone but how is that fair to the non-unionized workforce, retired and everyone in between have to pay for someone else's better life while barely getting through themselves?  Should the taxpayer base continue this, and if so, how long will it be before this province becomes business unfriendly again and people and business begin to leave again?  This will happen and can happen sooner than one would think. We need to fix this problem and unfortunately labour is our for themselves for the most part and not for the betterment of society as a whole. Yes, in the past with poor pay and labour conditions they helped bring about change but so did employers and now the ball is in the unions court, will they concede that they are a very large part of this huge burden or will they continue on as they have and further drive our economy down?

Time is for change and the people of Saskatchewan spoke very loudly at the last election and they will again this fall.  It is time for the unions to take responsibility and make some serious concessions with respect to pension and benefit reform.  The people of this province voted for a more open market, a major shift, a new direction and it is time for Organized Labour to realize and accept this.  Yes, the change is in the wind, but we need everyone on board to make this province the best it can be.  So labour, what do you have to say?

Have a great rest of your day,

David

Welcome To The Common Sense Conservative Blog

Hello, and welcome to my blog, my name is David and I am proud to be able to host this blog.  I live in Regina, Saskatchewan in the great country of Canada. Within this blog is going to be the musings of all things that affect daily lives, be it local, federal or international, the common sense approach will be taken be it politically right or wrong.  I will push what this conservative feels is a common sense approach to dealing with political, social and family issues.  I will outline both sides of arguments when I can and bring forth what I believe to be the common sense approach to a solution.  My hope for this blog is for people to read it and understand more of an issue than what the media or either side of that said issue are willing to report.

I do feel, that in trying to be too politically correct, politicians of all stripes forget that a common sense approach could probably solve all problems in the world.  I feel that we need to step back from where we are and try to figure out just where we have gone wrong?  Can society continue to function the way it is, can the world live in peace, can we solve hunger, disease, or any other issue that we as a people face today?

By reading my blog I hope to help find a common ground between opposing sides, be it labor(labour), politicians, taxes, welfare, social injustice, human rights, religion and much much more.  We need to find and solve these problems before they get worse or we all will pay the price in time.  I allow posting by all sides as long as it is done in a way that goes too hard right or too hard left.  The blog is about finding that all important middle ground and I hope my readers will have that same approach to life and post accordingly.  Am I passive, hell no but I am able to listen to both sides and form a rational opinion.  There is always an issue in the world so the topics are endless, if you would like a certain topic talked about feel free to bring it up, and if appropriate, I will blog my common sense approach to the situation.

I hope you like what you see here and if you do make sure to follow and keep up to date.....the common sense way!

Enjoy the rest of your day,
David