Showing posts with label socialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label socialism. Show all posts

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

The New Saskatchewan

Happy New Year everyone! As promised I am back blogging, although with work and family commitments I will not be able to spend as much time as I would like right now. Hoping that this will change going forward.

So here we are 2012, a lot has changed over the past few years, socialism has reared it's ugly head to the point of taking down large amounts of the world's economies, dictators have fallen, countries are waking up to a new conservatism while others are diving in deeper into the socialist/communist regimes.

In Canada and particularly here in Saskatchewan we have taken a look at what has continued to transpire around the globe and decided we do not want to fall prey to the same left wing tactics that have taken Europe by storm over the past few generations. We see countries losing their Triple A status, we see the unrest in the streets and we see the fall of many leaders who have done little or nothing to help their own people.

In Saskatchewan we spoke loud and clear this past fall, we do not want to fall back into our socialist ways, we have seen what comes of it over time and that has served as a wake up call.

Socialism has worked in Saskatchewan for many years because of the hand outs we always knowingly accepted from the Federal Governments. We were always there with our hands out asking Ontario, Alberta and the like to pay for our out of control spending, our socialist practices and out offensive union contracts. Without that help we would have suffered the same fate as Greece, Italy, Spain!

But we have turned the corner in Saskatchewan and we like what we have found, prosperity that could last many generations based on our resources alone. But does that mean we can sit back? Not at all, we must use some of this wealth to develop others areas of our economy that will move us forward after the resources. We cannot look at a 5-10 year plan, we must think 50+ years into the future. Where will future wealth be created? I will not try to make myself sound like a person who is capable to seeing the future but I am capable of realizing that most resources are finite and some day they will run out. By then our population could be around 2 million people and this is where some outside of the box thinking can go a long way.

We have seen a growing trend right next door in Alberta, they have taken their economy from a mostly resource driven economy to a more balanced economy. With large investments in financials, medicine, engineering, services and much more you have borne witness to an economy that has been able to weather the storm better than in the past. You may think that Alberta went through the recession with a lot of bumps and bruises and that is true, but a large part of this slowdown was caused by their own government getting greedy and upping the royalty rates on oil & gas. I submit that they would have done much better if the rates had gone unchanged. There still would have been a slowdown but not nearly as deep as it ultimately came to be. Sure oil & gas still plays a huge roll in Alberta's treasury but not nearly as much as in the 70's and 80's. Alberta has done a great job of diversifying their economy so that if one segment goes down it will not affect them nearly as much. This is what Saskatchewan needs to now do, we have oil, gas, potash and uranium, plus our yearly crops, but we need more. We witness the crash of potash prices a couple years back and how is impacted out government finances. Diversification would allow for us to better absorb a slowdown in certain parts of our economy.

Diversification will lead to a more sustainable economy, one that will be able to buck the trend, one that will weather the ever increasing storms and one with a bright future. No longer can we be considered socialists, but at the same extent we must not lose sight of what is important and what will help Saskatchewan continue to be the envy of our country and even the world. We cannot sit back, we need to keep moving our economy forward through innovation and of course value added businesses for our resources. We made the right choice in November and going forward we need make sure that socialism stays where it should.......in the past!

Wednesday, 14 September 2011

Republicans Win NY Race

Is this a sign of things to come in 2012?  I am thinking it may be if, and I do mean if the GOP pick the right preson to run up against Obama.  The results from two special elections last night makes it look like the people are really starting to tire of Obama's handling of the economy.  The election is going to be about jobs and if the U.S. continues to tred water or even lose more jobs before now and then I think a one term president is what Obama will be.  I believe I heard last night that this seat has been in Democrat hands since 1923, shows you what kind of shift is happening to the south of us.

Republican Wins House Race in New York, Seen as Obama Rebuke

Published September 14, 2011
| Associated Press
Republicans have scored an upset victory in a House race that became a referendum on President Barack Obama's economic policies.
Retired media executive and political novice Bob Turner defeated Democratic state Assemblyman David Weprin in a special election Tuesday to succeed Rep. Anthony Weiner, a seven-term Democrat who resigned in June after a sexting scandal.

Related Video

Victories for Republicans in New York, Nevada
With more than 80 percent of precincts reporting, Turner had 54 percent of the vote to Weprin's 46 percent in unofficial results.
"We've been asked by the people of this district to send a message to Washington," Turner told supporters after the landmark win. "I hope they hear it loud and clear. We've been told this is a referendum. Mr. President, we are on the wrong track. We have had it with an irresponsible fiscal policy which endangers the entire economy."
Weprin did not immediately concede.
The heavily Democratic district, which spans parts of Queens and Brooklyn, had never sent a Republican to the House. But frustration with the continued weak national economy gave Republicans the edge.
Turner has vowed to bring business practicality to Washington and push back on spending and taxes.
The race was supposed to be an easy win for Democrats, who have a 3-1 ratio registration advantage in the district.
Weprin, a 56-year-old Orthodox Jew and member of a prominent Queens political family, seemed a good fit for the largely white, working-class district, which is nearly 40 percent Jewish.
But voter frustration with Obama put Weprin in the unlikely spot of playing defense. A Siena Poll released Friday found just 43 percent of likely voters approved of the president's job performance, while 54 percent said they disapproved. Among independents, just 29 percent said they approved of Obama's job performance.
Turner, a 70-year-old Catholic, vowed to push back on Obama's policies if elected. He received help from prominent Republicans including former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, whose much-praised stewardship of the city after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks was recalled during the 10th anniversary of the attacks last weekend.
Weprin became embroiled in New York-centric disputes over Israel and gay marriage, which cost him some support among Jewish voters.
Orthodox Jews, who tend to be conservative on social issues, expressed anger over Weprin's vote in the Assembly to legalize gay marriage. In July, New York became one of six states to recognize same-sex nuptials.
Former Mayor Ed Koch, a Democrat, endorsed Turner in July as a way to "send a message" to Obama on his policies toward Israel. And Weprin was challenged on his support of a proposed Islamic center and mosque near the World Trade Center site, in lower Manhattan.
The Democratic Party enlisted two of its biggest guns, former President Bill Clinton and Gov. Andrew Cuomo, to record phone calls for Weprin. And Democrats relied on organized labor and other affiliated groups to bring voters to the polls.
The House seat opened up when Weiner was pushed by party leaders to resign after sending sexually provocative tweets and text messages to women he met online.
The trouble for Weiner, who served seven terms, began when a photo of a man's crotch surfaced on his Twitter feed. He initially denied the photo was of him but later admitted it was.
Weiner, who's married, resigned June 16 after two weeks of fighting off pressure to step aside. He apologized for "the embarrassment that I have caused" and said he hoped to continue to fight for the causes dear to his constituents.
In a special election in May, Democrat Kathy Hochul won a heavily Republican upstate district after pledging to protect Medicare, the popular government health care plan for seniors.
The state replaced outdated lever-operated voting machines last year in favor of paper ballots and optical scanners, which take more time to close and process. Polls closed at 9 p.m. Tuesday, and results trickled in slowly, but a Board of Elections spokeswoman said the vote-tallying system was running smoothly and there were no problems to report.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09/14/republican-wins-house-race-in-new-york-seen-as-obama-rebuke/#ixzz1Xx2CBpZn

Wednesday, 10 August 2011

Just What is Going On In The World?

We have riots in the streets of London, Al Shabaab fighting to keep western aid from reaching millions of starving people in Africa, stock markets around the world on a roller coaster ride from hell, mass killing going on in Syria and an American president who has failed his people on the economy, just to name a few.

It is a world in turmoil, the likes we probably have not seen since the second world war and it doesn't look like it will get better any time soon.  Which begs the question, what can we do to fix things?  My common sense solutions below.

Our world for the most part has been living life like socialists for far too long. Even the right side of the political spectrum has been giving free hand outs far too often.  We need to get back to our roots, where people were not afraid to put in an honest days work, raise a family, and expect nothing from government unless it is an unforeseen circumstance such as drought, hurricanes, earthquakes and the like.  Far too often we look to government to step in when times are tough, instead of rolling up our sleeves and getting to work like our forefathers did.  If we truly want change we have to look inside ourselves and decide that change has to start from within.  We are the ones who need to change, we need to stop with the handouts, dig deep and get things done!

Solution for anarchy in London and everywhere else.  Make the people pay for their actions!  Too long have we allowed this kind of stuff to go on without serious consequences.  Sure, have your peaceful demonstrations but if you get out of line you are going to jail, it is that simple.  How many of these people would be out doing what they do if they knew that they would get much, much more than a slap on the wrist?  If the justice system actually enforced the law these people would be looking at years in jail.  It is time to make the justice system work the way it is supposed too and stop pandering to the far left.  This will bring people back down to earth and make them accountable for their actions.  The use of rubber bullets, tear gas, and other methods should be allowed as soon as the police see actions like this ongoing.  These anarchists will soon fall in line, or at least learn how to have a peaceful demonstration.

Starvation in Africa.  This can be called a man made disaster, yes the drought is out of our hands but the price of food has also played a very large roll in this.  The price of food is being driven by the countries such as China and India as well as others.  But also adding to this is the use of food products being used to produce fuels.  This action, especially in the U.S. and Canada has made grains much more expensive which in turn boosts costs of feeding livestock and other meats.  What needs to be done, especially in the States is a move to a more efficient product such as switchgrass.  This stuff can be grown anywhere and does not consume as much energy to produce biofuels.  The energy needs of the U.S. can also be alleviated by drilling for fuels at home.  There has been too much of this "not in my backyard" B.S. and for generations the U.S. has not allowed energy companies to drill some very large economical areas that would dramatically decrease the country's dependence on Middle Eastern oil.  This would mean jobs, taxes and much much more for the U.S. economy, something they dearly need.  But first the left need to get the hell out of the way and let the people who actually want to help the country do their job!  There is enough natural gas in the U.S. to last generations, which will buy them enough time to develop other means of energy that are currently under development.  It is a band aid on the problem but one that could tie them over until these new energy strategies come to fruition.

The U.S. economy and it's affect on the world as a whole.  The powers that be in Washington need to start working for the people and not for their own political agendas.  There needs to be serious cuts to spending, not this piece of junk that they tabled last week which does nothing to cut their debt.  It in fact allows the debt to grow to 20 trillion dollars by the year 2020.  20 Trillion Bucks!!!  You think things are bad now, just think what their debt rating will be like by 2020!  Everything needs to be cut, the people just need to wake up and realize that they will have to do with less.  Less government handouts, less entitlement spending, less government employment opportunities and yes, less unions and their constant drag on a nations ability to compete on the international stage.  But this goes back to the change we need to find within ourselves, it starts at home and then you can hold your politicians accountable.  The Nancy Pelosi's of the world need to be run out of politics and vote in someone who will make the tough decisions, not the easy ones that will garner a lot of votes.  It is this way of thinking that has gotten us into this mess and it needs to change or the mess will just keep piling up.  The people in the U.S. need to also get over the "I don't pay tax" way of thinking.  In order to get this debt paid down a national tax on consumption is a must.  Everyone pays it on goods and services, not just the rich, and middle class.  The nice thing about a consumption tax is that it is a fair system that will tax the rich way more because they obviously would consume much more than the lower classes.  The national consumption tax would bring in un-foretold amounts of income to the federal government and help them get their great country back on track.  Tea Party, GOP, DEMS, it doesn't matter who you are, get your act together and do what is right for the country!

The Middle East uprising has been a missed opportunity for the west to show that we are behind our fellow brothers and sisters.  Our politicians are too slow to react and typically the reaction is not strong enough to prove solidarity.  We need actions, not just words.  Add in the U.N. which is being run like a kangaroo court and needs to make wholesale changes in order for it to be legit once again.  The security council laws need to change to make it majority rule instead of giving the permanent members the ability to quash anything that they disagree with.  It is either that or do away with the security council and let the vote happen between all member nations of the U.N. where 50% plus one means action.  This ability by Russia and China to hand tie the security council from recommending action is ridiculous and has made the U.N. the laughing stock of the world.  It no longer is legitimate and unless changes happen it will remain this way.  For far too long the U.S. and it's allies have had to police the world at it's expense.  If any action is needed in the world it should be international law that all expenses are shared by those who are part of the U.N. and then all money recouped by the country that has needed the help.  Then the trillions of dollars the U.S. spends in taking action would come back the the U.S. people, sounds fair doesn't it?  It has cost the U.S. a trillion dollars or more going into Iraq and Iran to liberate them, should this money not be paid back over time?

These are just some common sense solutions to a few of the world's problems, there are many more problems of course but these are the major ones right now and if these changes are made the world's economy would have a chance at stabilizing and the markets would return to normal.  Again, it is time to hold our politicians accountable and right the ship before it gets consumed by the wave of socialism.

Friday, 5 August 2011

Is Socialism Dying a Slow Death? let's Keep Our Fingers Crossed!

I think it is starting to sink in, that socialism does not work and has led to what we are seeing the world over.  Economies in distress because of a few countries who have for generations lived off the government.  This needs to be corrected by all, especially in the U.S. where things are looking really bad.  Here in Canada, we must find a way for Quebec and the Maritimes to stand on their own.  Live within their means, balance budgets and stop looking for handouts from Ottawa and the rest of the country.  It should be law that every government in our dominion has to put forward a balanced budget, no matter what the economy is doing.  Just like families, when things are tough you tighten the purse strings, we should expect no less from our governments!



Italy speeds up austerity to calm financial nerves
ROME — Italy will speed up a package of austerity measures approved last month to achieve budget balance by 2013, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi said Friday in a fightback against a wave of financial market panic.
"We believe it is opportune to accelerate the measures... to reach a budget balance early -- in 2013 instead of 2014," Berlusconi said at a news conference.
"We are responding to the demands of markets that are governed by no-one, not even speculators, and operate independently from economic reality," he said.
"We have to recognise that the world has entered a global financial crisis that concerns all countries," he added.
Italy's main centre-left opposition Democratic Party warned that the speeding up of austerity cuts was "irresponsible." Berlusconi's critics say the measures hit Italy's poorest hardest by reducing social welfare payments.
Berlusconi said lawmakers would be called back early from summer recess to start working "immediately" on measures including a constitutional amendment that would force Italian governments to keep balanced budgets.
The amendment -- similar to one in force in Germany -- was announced by Berlusconi after emergency talks with trade unions and big business on Thursday.
"International speculators are paying particular attention to us and we have to put a stop to it," he said on Friday.
Economy Minister Giulio Tremonti meanwhile said the government would also present some major labour market reforms to trade unions and big business.
"The labour market is fundamental for development and investments," he said, adding that there would be a crackdown on a variety of tax exemptions.
Italy has been badly hit on the stock and bond markets in recent weeks by investors concerned about its high public debt, anaemic economic growth, as well as signs of tensions within Berlusconi's centre-right coalition.
Italian shares plunged 13.12 percent this past week, although market rumours that the European Central Bank was intervening to support the highly vulnerable markets for Italian and Spanish bonds helped stem the slide on Friday.
Italy's parliament last month adopted a four-year 48-billion-euro ($68-billion) austerity budget aimed at cutting the public deficit from 4.6 percent of output last year to just 0.2 percent by 2014.
The plan, which included deep cuts to regional subsidies, family tax benefits and top-tier pensions, was heavily criticised by many commentators for delaying by far the most painful cuts until 2013 and 2014.
The mandate of Berlusconi's centre-right government runs out in 2013.
The 74-year-old prime minister's motorcade was met by around 100 protesters outside government offices in central Rome as he arrived for the news conference.
"Clown!" one man shouted. Another said: "You are the ruin of Italy, go home!"
Berlusconi also told reporters he had agreed with French President Nicolas Sarkozy on holding an emergency meeting of G7 finance ministers of leading world economies in a few days to discuss the debt crisis ahead of a possible G8 summit.
France holds the presidency of the G7, G8 and G20 economic powers.
A spokesman for Berlusconi, Paolo Bonaiuti, later said that the prime minister's comments were part of an "ongoing reflection" and did not mean that "a decision has been taken" on the international meeting.

Wednesday, 20 July 2011

Mayor Ford In Toronto, a Sign of The Times?

With the election of Mayor Rob Ford, the city took a hard right turn politically speaking.  Now what does this mean to the rest of Ontario, organized labour and the rest of Canada.

For too long the most populous cities in this country have been run by steadfast socialists and for far too long they have bled the coffers dry and made the rest of Canada pay for their "love of humanity"  Now comes along a Mayor who is set to take on the big unions in his city, he has put them on notice that there are going to be changes coming and that their sitting at the trough is about to end.  Toronto is run by big labour, the provincal and local governments made their bed with these guys and now it is about to do a full 180.  Ford is standing up to labour and has publicly stated that the people of Toronto will stand for long strikes, if that is what is needed to reign in the expenses brought on by union contracts.  He knows what it is going to take to curb expense and lets face it labour is the problem, it is the super lucrative contracts that previous administrations signed that have come to bite the people of Toronto in the butt.  Something has to give and it is time that labour really looks at itself and figure out that they are the problem.(more on that in my next post)

Now, what does this mean for the rest of the province and Canada?  Rob Ford has listened to the people of his city and it taking appropriate actions.  He will be smeared publicly by big labour, he will be hated by many on the far left but he will stand tall knowing he is doing the right thing by the taxpayers.  The tax base has had enough and they signaled that by voting Ford in as mayor, they want change and change now!  Now with Ontario staring at large debt loads and having to take equalization payments from Ottawa, the taxpayers seem to be ready to do the same on the provincial level.  It looks like the Conservatives will become government and maybe by a large majority.  This means that the changes being taken at the city level can now carry on to the provincial level.  The people are speaking up and it is time for the politicians to hear their voices.

Federally is a different situation, we have had a conservative government for some time but finally have a majority to work with.  They have already set sail on a bunch of changes coming.  They are freezing most hiring, getting rid of the boondoggle gun registry as well as getting tougher on crime.  Now they are starting to look at themselves and try to figure out where cuts can come from to bring down the debt.  Canada is in a great position when compared to the rest of the world but that doesn't mean we should rest on our laurels, we need to keep at it and reduce the debt load that our children will have to pay for.  This means pensions must be looked at as well as the benefits.  This is a large portion of the annual budget and needs to be addressed as they are unfunded in the years to come and myself as a taxpayer do not think I should have to pay for someone's retirement when I have to save my whole life in order to retire.  Typically government employees are paid much better, have better benefits and pension plans than that of an equal working in the private sector.

All in all, this movement that seems to be sweeping the country is not only good for us but also for our children and their children.  We live within our means and should demand that our governments do the same.

Is It Time To Live Within Our Means In Canada?

It is my belief that all governments should live within their means.  This means balanced budgets, cuts to programs that are either ineffective, outdated or simply not run as lean as it can.  Our governments have allowed the pigs to sit at the trough long enough and it is time to tighten the belt strings before it really affects our economies.  The cuts really need to start within government where they have been guilty of growing governments at unprecedented rates over the last 10-20 years.  This means more salaries being paid, more benefits and more pensions going unfunded.  The federal government alone has a $200,000,000,000 unfunded pension shortfall, where is this going to leave the younger generations?  They are going to have to pay for our failures?  Doesn't seem fair now does it?


This is why I am calling on all governments in Canada to make it law to have balanced budgets.  Governments should be run just like any business or family, which means living within it's means.  No more hiring, spending cuts and unfortunately maybe even some small tax increases when and where needed.  Governments should have the ability to raise and lower the GST, PST & HST on a yearly basis in order to meet their budget needs.  This will put them in the position where they know the people will not stand for much in the way of tax increases and learn how to make do with what they have coming in with taxes and other means of revenue, just like any business or family has to.


P.S. Just how long do we continue to pay these high amounts to Quebec? $7.8 billion in one year alone, should they be forced to make do with much less?  I think it is time for them to stand up and become more productive and develop their economy better.  But in order to do that they must vote the right way and I am afraid that will not happen until we(the rest of Canada) cut them off.



Growing equalization payments to Ontario threaten country: expert

Aaron Lynett/National Post
Aaron Lynett/National Post
Federal equalization payments to Ontario have risen 534% in the two years since the province received its first payment.
  Jul 20, 2011 – 6:35 AM ET Last Updated: Jul 19, 2011 8:16 PM ET
By Lee Greenberg
TORONTO — In just three years, Ontario has become the second-largest recipient of equalization payments in the country, with $2.2-billion set to flow into its “have-not” coffers this year.
Only Quebec, which takes in $7.8-billion in such payments, receives more.
More ominously, Ontario’s burgeoning take threatens to destabilize Confederation, says one of the country’s leading academics, by creating problems for Quebec, Manitoba and the Atlantic provinces.
Tom Courchene, an economist at Queen’s University and a senior scholar at the Institute of Research on Public Policy says those other have-not provinces will find themselves increasingly squeezed out of a fixed pot of equalization money as Ontario takes a bigger share of the pie.
Federal equalization payments to Ontario have risen 534% in the two years since the province received its first payment. The program has been capped at Canada’s GDP growth since 2009.
Courchene says, that as a result, a “crowding out” effect will make flaws in the oft-criticized federal program harder to ignore.
“The poorer Ontario is, the less other provinces are going to get,” he says. “It’s a big issue and it’s going to get bigger.”
Matthew Mendelsohn, director of the Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation, says Ontario’s growing equalization take will likely cause tension between recipient provinces and the federal government.
“The growth cap has certainly not been happily received by many provinces,” he says. “They’re pushing for change here. And as Ontario’s take grows, that may put even more pressure on other provinces, who may escalate their argument with the federal government, that the federal government should stop the artificial (limit on) growth of equalization.”
Ontario’s diminishing status is partially a result of the demise of its manufacturing industry, says Courchene. The decline is also a relative one, however.
Compared to the soaring economies in B.C., Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland, all resource-rich provinces whose oil and gas are fuelling growth in India and China — Ontario is looking increasingly impoverished.
“(Equalization) really isn’t a reflection of a province’s underlying economic strength,” says Mendelsohn. “It’s a reflection of whether they are dominantly a natural resource, carbon petro-economy or not . . . .That’s what’s driving the equalization program right now. It makes sense now to think of oil provinces and non-oil and gas provinces rather than poor provinces and rich provinces.”
The resource boom in those petro economies has had a double effect on Ontario, having sent the Canadian dollar soaring by roughly 40% since 2004.
The higher dollar has in turn clobbered Ontario’s struggling manufacturing sector, which has hemorrhaged 290,000 full-time jobs over the past decade.
In economic theory, that scenario is known as “Dutch disease”, so coined by the Economist in 1977 after manufacturing in the Netherlands was decimated by the discovery of a large natural gas field.
“We’re just too small an economy to try to have one of the largest resource operations in the world at the same time as trying to have a world class manufacturing sector,” says Courchene, one of the most prolific and well-respected scholars in Canada.
The Kingston-based academic suggests implementing a fixed exchange rate with the U.S.
“We need to be part of a larger currency so when oil prices rise, we stay with the U.S. dollar, we don’t go up by 20-30% and destroy manufacturing.”
Meanwhile, Ontario continues to struggle even after its equalization top up, with lower levels of public services than many other provinces.
A report by a Winnipeg-based think tank in 2010 stated Ontario had fewer public servants, nurses, doctors, teachers, day-care spots and long-term care beds than in most other provinces.
That runs counter to the objectives of equalization, introduced in 1957 as a means to ensure comparable public services in all 10 provinces.
It costs Ontario roughly 10% more, on average, to provide a “bundle” of public services — one doctor, one nurse, one social worker, a judge and a police officer, for example — than it does in other have-not provinces, says Courchene.
While federal MPs from traditional have-not provinces have long fought for greater funding for their home turf, Ontario MPs have typically considered themselves federal first.
In negotiating a range of federal allocations for such things as immigration settlement, training funds, infrastructure and social housing, Ontario has had to settle for inferior agreements in recent years.
“There’s still a perception out there that Ontario is the fat cat,” says Courchene. “It’s all part of a pattern where everybody assumes Ontario is big enough to look after itself. The answer is increasingly it isn’t. It’s not able to provide the level of public services that other provinces can.”
Although Ontario was eligible for payments for five years from 1977 to 1981, federal politicians at the time balked at sending money to the country’s most populous province. Ontario received its federal transfer, $347-million, in 2009-10.
In 2010, equalization jumped to $972-million. This year it will total $2.2-billion.
Ottawa Citizen

Tuesday, 19 July 2011

House Approves 'Cut, Cap and Balance' Plan

House Approves 'Cut, Cap and Balance' Plan

Published July 19, 2011
| FoxNews.com
The House of Representatives has approved the GOP's 'Cut, Cap and Balance' plan with a vote of 234 to 190.
The bill imposes caps on federal spending as a percentage of GDP. It also allows for an increase in the debt ceiling by $2.4 trillion in exchange for both the Senate and House approving a balanced budget amendment.
House Speaker John Boehner  played a muted role in public during the day, but later applauded the passage of the plan.
“House Republicans are the only ones to put forward and pass a real plan that will create a better environment for private-sector job growth by stopping Washington from spending money it doesn’t have and preventing tax hikes on families and small businesses," he said in a statement. "The White House hasn’t said what it will cut."
But nine Republicans voted no on the plan, including Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn. and Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas. Five Democrats sided with Republicans.
“I have never voted to raise the federal debt limit, and I have no doubt that we face financial collapse and ruin if we continue to grow our debt," Paul said in a statement. "We need to make major spending cuts now, in this budget, and we can no longer afford to allow more deficit spending based on promises of future cuts."
The plan is under a veto threat by Obama amid predictions that it won't make it through the Senate.
Meanwhile, President Obama on Tuesday urged lawmakers to pick a "clear direction" within the next couple days on how to raise the debt ceiling and cut deficits, praising a bipartisan group of senators for putting a renewed budget plan on the table while criticizing House Republicans for pushing a separate proposal he said will not pass. 
"We don't have any more time to engage in symbolic gestures. We don't have any more time to posture," Obama said.  
According to the White House, Obama plans to once again summon congressional leaders for a meeting on the way forward. Speaking to reporters briefly Tuesday afternoon, the president warned that lawmakers are now "in the eleventh hour" and need to start "talking turkey" about crafting actual legislation that has a chance at passing. 
He seemed to urge lawmakers to use the so-called "Gang of Six" plan as a new starting point for a "broader agreement," claiming it overlapped with his general goals for a deficit-reduction deal. 
That plan seeks to extract nearly $4 trillion in deficit reduction over the next decade through a combination of tax increases and spending cuts. A group of 50 senators gathered Tuesday for more than an hour to hear from the reunited so-called "Gang of Six" -- a group of three Republicans and three Democrats which led discussions before breaking apart in the spring. 
Their deficit-reduction plan has already won the support of the Senate's No. 3 Republican, Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, and cautious optimism from one of the Obama administration's toughest critics, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.
Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid called the balanced-budget proposal "the stupidest constitutional amendment I've ever seen." 
Republicans fiercely defend the cut, cap and balance proposal, noting that they've done more than Obama in putting a plan on the table. 
"The president continues to say that he wants to do big things. We do as well. We put forward our big plan and vision in our budget," House Republican Leader Eric Cantor said. "But we implore the president -- let's do big things, let's go ahead and get our fiscal house in order. But let's do so without imposing higher taxes on the small business people that we need so desperately to start hiring again." 
Fox News' Chad Pergram contributed to this report.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/19/house-approves-cut-cap-and-balance-plan/#ixzz1ScCYEQES