Showing posts with label Canadian senate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canadian senate. Show all posts

Monday, 27 May 2013

Time To Abolish The Senate?

For many years discussions have taken place across the country. From what does the senate actually contribute to Canada to can we actually live without it?

Being a common sense conservative I will be the first person to state that I believe the time has come to disband the senate and it's un-elected officials. Sure we could have elected officials in the senate but then stand the chance that we would have a house and senate controlled by polar opposites much like in the States and end up with nothing being accomplished in a political gridlock that can last a generation. I do like to have checks and balances but is there really a way to accomplish this without a properly elected senate? Maybe a senate that is elected with no party affiliation, but you would still know where people sit before every voting for them and hence the same problem that the U.S. faces year in and year out.

Our provinces seem to make out just fine without senates and I would argue that maybe without the extra step that is the senate, government seems to become more efficient at running itself. We the people elected our MP's and MLA's to speak for us and we hold them accountable every 4 years, if they are not doing what we like, well you know what happens... The senate on the other hand, un-elected and unaccounted for which makes it a disease in of itself in the Canadian Constitution, a disease that we have an easy cure for. But the cure has it's side affects...

In order to abolish the senate you need to open up the constitution to reforms and there in lies the problem. We have too many groups within our nation that will want more perks tossed in that will cost the rest of Canada. Don't think for a second that Quebec will not want more out of equalization than they currently get, or that maybe Saskatchewan can fight and finally get non-renewable resources pulled out of the equalization math(and rightfully so as is the case in other jurisdictions), or natives wanting more land, Ontario wanting more representation... Well soon you see where this is going, it is a can of worms that I think will be hard to close.

There are constitutional lawyers throughout the country working on this as we speak, some for governments some for self interest groups and all ready to pounce at any given moment. Can the senate be abolished without opening the constitution, that will play out in the courts of the land as we move forward, most are under the assumption that you cannot reform without opening the constitution so abolishment seems to be the only path that "may" be able to be taken. Kind of strange that reform would be harder to accomplish than abolishment but who am I to argue with the political scholars, lawyers and judges?

It costs the Canadian public well over $100 million to run the senate every year, does not sound like to much in the grand scheme of things but over time it adds up and because they are not held to account it is my belief that it is time for it to go.


ProGOPGear.com: Patriotic T-Shirts, Stickers, and more!

Tuesday, 12 July 2011

I Would Rather Abolish it, but if the Senate Has to Stay Reform is a Must


Canadians support Harper’s plan for Senate reform, poll shows

Chris Wattie / Reuters
Chris Wattie / Reuters
A view of the Senate Chamber on Parliament Hill
  Jul 12, 2011 – 1:22 PM ET
A new poll suggests Canadians support the Conservatives’ plan for Senate reform, including setting term limits and requiring senators to win their seats in an election.
The Angus Reid online poll found that 40% of Canadians think the country needs a Senate and should be involved in the process of choosing senators, but that citizens are divided on just how a seat in the Red Chamber should be earned. When asked if the Senate should be abolished altogether, respondents were scattered: 34% supported the idea, 35% opposed it, and 31% said they were not sure.
The polling firm has conducted four surveys on Senate reform since February 2010, and Angus Reid Public Opinion Vice President Jaideep Mukerji says public opinion on the matter has remained consistent over the last year.
“When you ask people about it and the extent to which they follow it, they have a clear view that the status quo with the Senate isn’t efficient and they’re open to different ways of having the Senate operate,” he said.
The majority of respondents in every province supported Canadians directly electing their senators, with 70% supporting eight-year term limits. Creating a panel of distinguished Canadians to choose senators instead of the prime minister was the least popular idea proposed, garnering 39% support. Seventy-one per cent say a nationwide referendum should be held to determine the Senate’s future.
The poll suggests that the anti-Senate attitude is most prevalent in Quebec, where 43% of respondents said they would abolish Senate and defer all legislation to be reviewed and authorized by the House of Commons.
Mr. Mukerji says this represents the wide-scale frustration Quebeckers feel with political representation.
“We saw it in full effect during the federal election, but I think it also extends into the negative view we’re seeing of the Senate in Quebec. I think they just have a more negative view of politicians in general right now.”
One constant in the survey is the rejection of the status quo: Only 5% of Canadians want to keep the current Senate guidelines in place.
“The longer this gets unresolved, the more opinions will turn on the Senate and perhaps public scrutiny will come down to bear on what they’re accomplishing as an institution,” Mr. Mukerji said.
However, the poll indicates that some respondents are more pessimistic than others: 30% of Canadians believe they will never be able to elect their senators, while 24% expect to be casting ballots by 2016.
The online poll surveyed 1,000 randomly selected Canadians who are Angus Reid Forum panelists between July 8 and July 9. The margin of error is 3.1%.
National Post