Wednesday 29 May 2013

Dr. Henry Morgentaler Dead At 90

Like him or hate him, Dr. Morgentaler changed the course of Canadian history. 


Canadian pro-abortion crusader Henry Morgentaler dead at 90

Canadian Press and National Post Staff | 13/05/29 | Last Updated: 13/05/29 3:47 PM ET

TORONTO — To his enemies he was a mass murderer, but to many he was the man who shed light on back-street abortions and put women’s health and choice on the front pages of newspapers, TV screens and radio airwaves.
Dr. Henry Morgentaler, who helped overturn Canada’s abortion law 25 years ago, died Wednesday at his Toronto home. He was 90.
Archives
In 1967 Morgentaler, then a family practitioner, emerged in Quebec as an advocate for the right of Canadian women to have abortion on demand, at a time when attempting to induce an abortion was a crime punishable by life in prison.
The issue became a polarizing issue in Canada: On one side the growing women’s liberation movement pushed for the right to choose, while the other was made up of those who equated abortion with murder.
Carolyn Egan, with the Ontario Coalition of Abortion Clinics, says Morgentaler had a huge impact on the lives of women in Canada, bringing them reproductive freedom.
Joyce Arthur, executive director of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada, says he is a “Canadian hero,” who saved the lives of countless women.
Morgentaler’s crusade earned him many opponents, and in reaction to his death today a spokeswoman for the anti-abortion group Campaign Life Coalition says she hopes Morgentaler repented before his death and that this marks what she called “an end to the killing in Canada.”
“Our country has lost a man of great courage, conviction and personal bravery,” Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne said in a statement.
In an interview with The Canadian Press in 2004, the pro-choice crusader said his five-year stay in the Nazi concentration camps of Auschwitz and Dachau prepared him for his showdown with Canada’s legal system.
“I had decided to break the law in order to help women — a disadvantaged class of people who were being unjustly treated and exposed to terrible danger,” said the slight man from behind a desk surrounded by family photos in his Toronto clinic. He was 81 at the time.
“The fact that it was the law didn’t play with me because in my mind laws can be wrong,” he said remembering his boyhood when simply being a Jew was reason enough to be imprisoned.
Morgentaler was born in Lodz, Poland and came to Canada after the Second World War. He completed his medical studies at the Universite de Montreal and interned at the Royal Victoria Hospital.
It was there that he happened upon a ward that made him realize the plight of women with unwanted pregnancies. It changed his life as well as the future rights of Canadian women.
“The Royal Victoria Hospital — and many other Montreal hospitals — had a whole ward specially designed for women who had bad abortions, and many of these women would die. Many would be injured to the point where they couldn’t have any more children.
“It was a terrible situation.”
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot
In 1967, Morgentaler spoke before a government committee considering changes to the abortion law.
He told of the dying and sick women he’d seen and said publicly that it was a woman’s choice to terminate a pregnancy.
After his speech, desperate women approached him for abortions, but as it was still an illegal procedure, he turned them away.
It was only after much soul-searching, that Morgentaler — with the hopes of eventually changing the law — started performing illegal abortions to women who requested his help.
“I felt, as a humanist and as a doctor, that I had a moral duty to help these women,” he told The Canadian Press.
In 1969, the federal government amended the law to make abortion legal under restricted conditions: A hospital committee would decide whether the continuation of the pregnancy would endanger the mother’s life or health.
Soon Morgentaler opened his first clinic in Montreal.
I felt, as a humanist and as a doctor, that I had a moral duty to help these women
By 1973, the clinic had been raided several times by police and charges laid. Later that year a Quebec jury acquitted Morgentaler but the Quebec Court of Appeal threw out the verdict. After the Supreme Court rejected his appeal, Morgentaler began serving an 18-month sentence.
Canadians on both sides took action: Those supporting abortion on demand held rallies calling for Morgentaler’s release while those who opposed abortion petitioned Ottawa.
Even in jail Morgentaler was defiant; he threw his boxer shorts in the face of a prison guard who told him to strip after being moved to an isolated room. The guard punched and kicked the doctor to the ground.
Morgentaler was released after serving 10 months.
In 1976, the newly elected Parti Quebecois government decided not to proceed with the charges against Morgentaler and doctors providing abortions in Quebec would not be prosecuted.
Morgentaler opened more clinics across the country.
More rallies, protests and legal battles followed until Jan. 28, 1988, when the Supreme Court struck down Canada’s abortion law as unconstitutional. Morgentaler was one of the key players in the case.
Archives
In 1990, the government tried to bring back the criminal control over abortion but the bill was narrowly defeated.
Morgentaler’s critics paint a very different picture, far from a benevolent advocate of women’s rights.
Gwen Landolt, national vice-president of REAL Women Canada, is a prolifer and a longtime Morgentaler adversary.
She believes that if abortion is an assertion of women’s rights, why aren’t more forthcoming about abortions they have had?
“Morgentaler was an opportunist,” Landolt said in an interview in 2004. “The only thing he could do was abortions and that, with the help of the media, he turned it around to be a great crusade.”
Morgentaler was an opportunist. The only thing he could do was abortions and that, with the help of the media, he turned it around to be a great crusade
“But he was really out for Morgentaler and money.”
As part of REAL Women and legal counsel for the anti-abortion Campaign Life Coalition, Landolt’s barbs are verbal. But other critics have been more than vocal about their opposition to abortion.
At the opening of Morgentaler’s Toronto clinic in 1983, a man lunged at him with garden shears. That and the 1993 bombing of the clinic left Morgentaler shaken but unharmed.
Political commentator and feminist Judy Rebick was walking beside Morgentaler when the man came at the doctor. Without hesitation, Rebick chased the man to his yard nearby.
But she remembers Morgentaler as the hero.
“I think Morgentaler is a hero because he risked his life many times for the struggle. The incident you describe was the one time I risked mine,” she said in early 2008.
Pierre Obendrauf/Montreal Gazette/Files
The shootings of other doctors in Canada in the 1990’s and the murder of an abortion provider in the United States forced Morgentaler to acknowledge he was a target. He started wearing a bullet-proof vest.
But he soon abandoned the vest, convincing himself he was invulnerable.
“Maybe it’s by accident it succeeded,” he said in 2004. “Because it was possible that some religious fanatic would come up and pump a few bullets.”
Morgentaler’s legal battles continued when he opened a clinics in Nova Scotia in 1989 and again in 1994, when he opened a clinic for the women in New Brunswick as these provinces passed legislation prohibiting abortions outside of hospitals. By 1995, provincial and federal rulings forced both provinces to allow private clinics.
Maybe it’s by accident it succeeded. Because it was possible that some religious fanatic would come up and pump a few bullets
Morgentaler closed his Halifax abortion clinic in 2003, 13 years after it opened. He said women were able to get appropriate care at Halifax’s Victoria General Hospital, where the procedure would be covered under provincial health insurance at the hospital.
Prolifers saw the closure as a victory.
In 2004, an honorary-degrees committee at Western University agreed to confer the degree on Morgentaler.
Those against the degree circulated a petition to demand the committee’s reversal, garnering 12,000 signatures. An anonymous donor withdrew a promise of a $2 million bequest to the university when it announced that Morgentaler was to be honoured.
Morgentaler said that all the fuss over the honour was proof that some people still opposed the rights of women.
TOBIN GRIMSHAW, THE OTTAWA CITIZEN
In 2008, Morgentaler received the Order of Canada, prompting an immediate backlash from abortion opponents.
Jean-Claude Cardinal Turcotte, the Archbishop of Montreal, asked that he be removed from the order to protest Morgentaler’s appointment.
Turcotte’s resignation was officially accepted by Gov. Gen. Michaelle Jean later that year. He was among several abortion opponents who resigned from the order.
It’s because of the debate people have changed their minds. Now they have the additional knowledge and experience that women no longer die as a result of abortions
The controversy surrounding Morgentaler made him a celebrity as his story yielded countless media profiles and a few television movies.
Morgentaler trained more than 100 doctors to perform abortions and opened 20 clinics across the country.
There are no longer hordes of protesters outside his clinics.
“It’s because of the debate people have changed their minds. Now they have the additional knowledge and experience that women no longer die as a result of abortions,” Morgentaler said in the earlier interview.
“We’ve come to a situation where women accept [abortion on demand] as part of their rights.”

Should Omar Khadr Ever Be Released?

He was a child "soldier" in some eyes, in others he was a young terrorist from a terrorist family. The Khadr family have used the Canadian system to it's full extent all the while breeding hatred and turning their children into home grown terrorists.
There is no doubt that Omar Khadr knew exactly what he was doing when he killed a military EVAC, he was fighting, not as a soldier which means he would be wearing a uniform but as a terrorist and as such should be treated as such. 
Should Mr. Khadr be free or should he spend the rest of his days in the pen? Many point to the fact that he was a child at the time,while others point to the fact that he still holds the same values as he did as a child terrorist. So what do we do with him, let him go into the general public in Canada, send him and his family back to their homeland, or keep him imprisoned?
If we let him go into the Canadian public CSIS will have to keep close tabs on him as he stand a good chance of re-offending and killing innocent civilians like his father, Taliban and Al Qaeda trained him to do.
I personally like the other two options better, although keeping him in prison for life is not an option in this liberal penal system that we have in Canada. 
No, it is time for the Khadr family to go back to their homeland. Send them packing and get them the hell out of our country, they have used our resources against us at every chance and this ultra-liberal/socialistic safety net needs to let them go. Our system was meant for Canadians who pledge allegiance to our nation, not individuals who just come to use the system all the while hating everything we as Canadians stand for. This individual and his family do just that and I think the majority of Canadians feel that the most common sense thing to do is get them out of our country and stop wasting tax payer money on people like this...

Former Guantanamo detainee Omar Khadr woke up in an Alberta prison Wednesday after months stuck in isolation at a penitentiary in Ontario where an inmate had threatened his life, The Canadian Press has learned.
Khadr was flown to the Edmonton Institution Tuesday, potentially ending a situation in which he had been deprived of prison programming that complicated efforts to seek parole, his lawyer Dennis Edney confirmed.
“Hopefully, this is a positive step in his long journey to freedom,” the Edmonton-based Edney said.
“I hope that this is a new start for Omar, an opportunity for people to see him as he really is – as someone who poses no threat to Canada, someone who has no radical viewpoints.”
The transfer allows Khadr to be closer to his lawyer and should obviate concerns about any negative influence from his family in Toronto, some of whom expressed sympathy for extremist groups several years ago.
The maximum-security Edmonton Institution is home to about 225 inmates.
The Toronto-born Khadr, 26, was transferred to Canada last September to serve out the remainder of an eight-year sentence handed down by an American military commission for war crimes he pleaded guilty to committing as a 15-year-old in Afghanistan.
He spent the next several months in segregation in Millhaven penitentiary west of Kingston, Ont., classified as a maximum-security inmate even though he was considered minimum security before leaving Guantanamo.
Khadr was finally allowed onto the range in February. In March, prison authorities asked him to work on the food line, handing out pieces of butter to other prisoners. When an inmate asked for more than was allowed, Khadr refused.
“This guy threatened to stab Omar,” Edney said in an interview.
As a result, authorities moved him back to strict solitary confinement, where he remained isolated in his cell for at least 23 hours a day ostensibly for his own protection.
“This is someone who has just spent 10 years of his life in that hell-hole that is Guantanamo Bay,” Edney said.
“Is there any difference between Guantanamo and what has taken place here?”
Efforts to reach Khadr were stymied by Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, who overturned the Millhaven warden’s decision allowing him to talk to a reporter, according to documents obtained by The Canadian Press.
Khadr was eligible for day parole in March but has yet to have a hearing.
Edney said stringent rules around the “hole” made it difficult for the prisoner to take part in programming, something a parole board would want to see in considering whether to grant him any early release.
“Nothing works for this kid,” Edney said Tuesday ahead of the transfer, adding Khadr was “just desperate” to get on with his life.
“He tells me it’s horrible in prison.”
Correctional authorities have repeatedly refused to discuss any aspect of Khadr’s case, citing privacy concerns.
Edney, who said his client poses no risk to public security, said he wondered whether the “illogical” maximum-security classification was another example of political interference by a government determined to portray him as a hardened terrorist.
Prison guards over the years have described him as friendly and compliant.
“Consultation with the unit staff indicates that he has not presented with any behavioural problems,” according to a recent internal Millhaven assessment.
Khadr has been following a special curriculum developed for him by faculty at King’s College in Edmonton. He was recently assessed as having the equivalent of a Grade 10 education, scoring marks that ranged from 91 to 97 per cent in the five subjects tested.
However, the restrictions made getting on with his studies difficult.
The last book sent to him, a short story called The Hockey Sweater, was returned as unauthorized.
Khadr is also looking to appeal his military commission conviction based on similar successful appeals by two other former Guantanamo prisoners.
Essentially, they argued they were found guilty of crimes that did not exist at the time of they committed the offences.

Let's Hope That This Is The End Of Robo-Calls

The Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission has issued unprecedented fines against several political parties and politicians for robo-calls that broke regulations by not properly identifying the caller.
The fines total $369,900 and were levied against the federal Conservatives, the federal NDP, the Ontario Progressive Conservatives, Alberta’s Wildrose Party, Liberal MP Marc Garneau, Conservative MP Blake Richards and a robo-calling firm, RackNine Inc.


The fines come after a “wide-ranging investigation” by the CRTC, the agency said. The calls in question didn’t properly identify themselves under CRTC telemarketing rules.
The Conservatives and Mr. Richards did not co-operate with investigators, the CRTC said. The others did, and have voluntarily agreed to settlements totalling $277,500. The Conservatives and Mr. Richards were fined $78,000 and $14,400, respectively, and now have 30 days to respond or pay the penalty.
Until last week, the largest fine levied by the CRTC against a political party was $4,900.
Political parties and candidates “didn’t understand [the rules] and didn’t appropriately do their homework to make sure they understood the rules,” Andrea Rosen, the CRTC’s Chief Compliance and Enforcement Officer, said in an interview. “…Canadians have a right to know who is calling them, and people should adhere to the rules to make it as easy as possible for a Canadian to voice their concern.
“What this is is an effort to ensure that everyone respects the rules,” she added.
The robo-calls are not tied to an investigation into misleading calls made during the 2011 election that a judge ruled were fraudulent. Instead, they are calls that didn’t identify the caller sufficiently.
At least part of the investigation was sparked by a complaint by Liberal MP Ralph Goodale, a source told The Globe and Mail. The Saskatchewan MP filed a complaint to the CRTC on Feb. 5 about robo-calls in his province. The calls were sent Jan. 31 and Feb. 1, 2013.
“The robo-calls were entirely anonymous,” Mr. Goodale said. “They identified a research company, Chase Research, which I gather is based in Alberta although we couldn’t find it listed in any corporate registry anywhere.”
The federal Conservatives later said they were behind the calls, which were placed by Edmonton-based RackNine Inc. Chase Research is an affiliate of RackNine. The CRTC collected information from RackNine on Feb. 11 and Feb. 12. But, according to a source close to the investigation, the CRTC then asked for more details – everything on any phone number RackNine had registered.
That included 3.4-million calls made for Wildrose in 2011 and 2012, none of which entirely complied with the strict laws. In particular, six Wildrose call blitzes – including one poll during last year’s election – raised concern. It paid a $90,000 fine, the largest of the seven issued.
One source called the RackNine search a “fishing trip” by the CRTC. RackNine co-operated, but many Canadian robo-calls are done by companies based partially or entirely outside the country. “What’s left to be seen is if all they do is go after low-hanging fruit,” the source said.
Ms. Rosen, however, said many investigations are still ongoing, acknowledging some of those are “possibly” targeted at other political parties or candidates. She considers the five cases where the subject was co-operative – Wildrose, the Ontario PCs, the federal NDP, Mr. Garneau and RackNine – to be closed books.
The fines signal a crackdown by the CRTC on robo-calling, which is increasingly used by political parties, charities and unions as a cheap way to communicate broadly. However, the rules state that every call must include, at the beginning, a local or toll-free number and a mailing address of the entity behind the call. This rule appears to have been widely broken. Recordings of similar calls places in Alberta from other parties, candidates and charities, provided to The Globe and Mail, indicate that these rules are not followed in a range of other cases.
The Ontario PCs paid an $85,000 fine for two robo-call campaigns that occurred between Sept. 1 and Sept. 7, 2011. It didn’t name the party or provide sufficient contact information, the CRTC ruled. The Ontario PCs co-operated, and spokesman Alan Sakach called it “an administrative error.”
The federal NDP was fined for robo-calls made Jan. 11 and Jan. 20, 2012, in the riding of Lise St-Denis, who crossed the floor and joined the Liberals. They calls didn’t say they were on behalf of the NDP, and didn’t include sufficient contact information. The party paid a $40,000 fine and co-operated. “We apologize for the error and are committed to ensuring it does not happen again,” the party’s national director, Nathan Rotman, said in a statement.
Mr. Garneau was fined for calls made in March of this year as part of his campaign for the Liberal leadership. They identified “the originator of the call” and had some contact information, but did not explicitly state they were on Mr. Garneau’s behalf and had no mailing address. He paid a $2,500 fine and co-operated.
RackNine paid a $60,000 fine and co-operated after 15 robo-call campaigns it carried out between March, 2011, and February, 2013, when Mr. Goodale complained. “RackNine was not aware that its practices were in violation,” the CRTC said.
The Conservatives were fined for robo-calls in Saskatchewan related to electoral boundary changes. They did not co-operate. Mr. Richards, an Alberta MP, was fined for two robo-call campaigns in 2012 that did not say they were on his behalf, or include a mailing address. He did not co-operate.
If either the Conservative Party of Mr. Richards chooses to argue a case, they’ll appear before a three-commissioner panel that has the power to reduce their fine, Ms. Rosen said. “You know, all I can say in terms of those two cases is that they were given an opportunity like everyone else,” Ms. Rosen said.
That revelation comes after Canada’s Chief Electoral Officer said the Conservative Party was not co-operating with his agency’s investigation into fraud committed during the 2011 election. A court ruling last week on another robo-call scandal – where voters, mostly in Guelph, Ont., were misled about polling station locations – found six Conservative MPs engaged in “trench warfare” to block or delay proceedings.
RackNine works often for both Wildrose and the federal Conservatives, but says it’s nonpartisan and doesn’t refuse any client. In an interview earlier this week, RackNine founder Matt Meier said he co-operated with the CRTC but declined to comment on specifics of the case, suggesting the CRTC case is still ongoing. “I can’t comment on any of this until I know [the outcome],” he said.
Last week, when its fine was first revealed, Wildrose warned that the ruling could affect other parties, including Alberta Premier Alison Redford’s Progressive Conservatives. The parties have traded jabs, each writing Alberta’s provincial chief electoral officer to ask for an investigation.
Wildrose has said it didn’t know so much contact information had to be included, and pointed to a previous TV interview by former Alberta PC campaign strategist Stephen Carter, saying such calls don’t require identification. He declined comment.
The Alberta PCs did not use RackNine during the last provincial election and officials wouldn’t comment on the unidentified survey type robo-calls that Wildrose is complaining about.
“We have not had any contact with the CRTC so we don’t know whether there’s anything going on with regards to investigating us,” said PC Party president Jim McCormick. “We have a high level of confidence that we obeyed the rules as laid out.”
Conservative spokesperson Fred DeLorey declined comment.
Drew Westwater, a spokesman with Elections Alberta, said his office received more than 800 complaints about robo-calls during the 2012 provincial election. Of the complaints, 15 to 20 per cent were about anonymous surveys, he said.
Elections Alberta passed them onto the CRTC along with all the other complaints. “This is the first time we’ve really run into this on a large scale like this and we really didn’t have a lot of authority in our act or legislation to deal with the calls related to surveys, which was a big bone of contention,” he said. It’s not clear what the CRTC did with those complaints.

Tuesday 28 May 2013

Time For Obama To Come Clean On Benghazi?

There is no doubt that in the fall last year, with an election looming, that those in the senior administration of the US government knew more about Benghazi than they to this day are letting on. Through the months that have passed Obama has steadfastly denied knowing more about the attack even though transcripts and emails have revealed top level communications that day and into the next about how they will spin the attack.

They held onto the damning parts until the election was won and now several months later we are hearing just how far up the administration these communications went. Not a whole lot linking Obama directly but one has to think that if a terrorist attack is ongoing the president would be up to date on all happenings, no matter what campaign mode he is in. There may be no online communications linking him but I have a hard time believing that there was not any face to face communications taking place at which time the wrong calls were made.

The fact that four Americans died in this attack that Obama and his administration deemed unworthy to try to take any action isn't enough, the administration has yet to come clean and hold anyone accountable for this inexcusable lack of judgement.

                                Get proactive protection against identity theft from LifeLock.
                                                            www.LifeLock.com


 As a president you are to do your very best to lead by example, surround yourself with top level administration and be 100% up to date on any, and I mean any security threat. This attack showed the lack of ability of this man to lead the nation in times when a leader is needed. He did not make any call to action, he didn't so much as pick up the phone to see if action was even possible(which has since been proven that there could have been). What did Obama do? Well he heard of the attack, jumped into bed and got up the next morning and headed off to Las Vegas for some big campaign fundraising event.

Is this the action of a leader? I think many, even those on the left would agree that this is far from leadership. Even if he was being sheltered from the reality of the situation he fails as a president for not having the trustworthy staff around him. If he was not brought up to speed it means his staff, Clinton and everyone else were more worried about winning the election than saving American lives.

The fact that the Marines were told to stand down by the administration is inexcusable in every aspect. These are trained fighters who had been needed and felt the urgency of the situation and refused to listen to orders to stand down and went in to fight, fight for every American human life that was in danger. This sense of pride in nation is what sent them into a very dangerous and hostile situation, full knowing that they could easily die. But fight they did and are about the only ones in this whole situation that should be held in high regard and as heroes, Obama proved he is not, Clinton surely isn't and the rest of the senior military command certainly aren't.

What transpired in Benghazi is first and foremost a tragedy, but the ongoing cover ups, the lack of leadership and the complete incompetence of senior administration in the military and the White House call into question Obama's ability to lead America. All those associated need to be held accountable forthwith including those within the White House.

Was Obama more worried about re-election, keeping Americans safe, not trying to anger the Muslim world or a good nights sleep? Who knows for sure, but he did not act as a president that is fit to lead his nation and time is up for him to come clean once and for all!


ProGOPGear.com: Patriotic T-Shirts, Stickers, and more!

Monday 27 May 2013

Time To Abolish The Senate?

For many years discussions have taken place across the country. From what does the senate actually contribute to Canada to can we actually live without it?

Being a common sense conservative I will be the first person to state that I believe the time has come to disband the senate and it's un-elected officials. Sure we could have elected officials in the senate but then stand the chance that we would have a house and senate controlled by polar opposites much like in the States and end up with nothing being accomplished in a political gridlock that can last a generation. I do like to have checks and balances but is there really a way to accomplish this without a properly elected senate? Maybe a senate that is elected with no party affiliation, but you would still know where people sit before every voting for them and hence the same problem that the U.S. faces year in and year out.

Our provinces seem to make out just fine without senates and I would argue that maybe without the extra step that is the senate, government seems to become more efficient at running itself. We the people elected our MP's and MLA's to speak for us and we hold them accountable every 4 years, if they are not doing what we like, well you know what happens... The senate on the other hand, un-elected and unaccounted for which makes it a disease in of itself in the Canadian Constitution, a disease that we have an easy cure for. But the cure has it's side affects...

In order to abolish the senate you need to open up the constitution to reforms and there in lies the problem. We have too many groups within our nation that will want more perks tossed in that will cost the rest of Canada. Don't think for a second that Quebec will not want more out of equalization than they currently get, or that maybe Saskatchewan can fight and finally get non-renewable resources pulled out of the equalization math(and rightfully so as is the case in other jurisdictions), or natives wanting more land, Ontario wanting more representation... Well soon you see where this is going, it is a can of worms that I think will be hard to close.

There are constitutional lawyers throughout the country working on this as we speak, some for governments some for self interest groups and all ready to pounce at any given moment. Can the senate be abolished without opening the constitution, that will play out in the courts of the land as we move forward, most are under the assumption that you cannot reform without opening the constitution so abolishment seems to be the only path that "may" be able to be taken. Kind of strange that reform would be harder to accomplish than abolishment but who am I to argue with the political scholars, lawyers and judges?

It costs the Canadian public well over $100 million to run the senate every year, does not sound like to much in the grand scheme of things but over time it adds up and because they are not held to account it is my belief that it is time for it to go.


ProGOPGear.com: Patriotic T-Shirts, Stickers, and more!